![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Writings |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. International outreach and recognition of PREVair and the Banque Populaire PREVair was presented to European institutions in 1993. As an outcome, the European Parliament approved a special budget line of 7 M ECU to subsidize access to environmental investment
of SMEs . The budget line is administered by the European Investment Fund (EIF) of the European Investment Bank (EIB), and takes the form of a free loan guaranty for PREVair type loans. The Bank obtained the First Prize (50,000
FRF = ca. 9,000 USD) for Best Practice in Environmental Management from the French Ministry of the Environment, as part of the French leg of the European Commission's Better Environment for Industry Awards. The Bank donated
the prize amount to ECO-Conseil as recognition for its pioneering work. On 5 September 1996, the Bank became the first French bank to sign the UNEP Declaration on Banking and the Environment at the Eco-Museum of Ungersheim,
Alsace. Frits Schlingemann, then Regional Director of the UNEP Regional Office for Europe (Geneva), and a representative of Corinne Lepage, then French Minister of the Environment, attended the signing ceremony. Also in
1996, one of the small companies financed by PREVair was presented by the International Network for Environmental Management (INEM), as part of its Casebook of Environmental Management in SMEs
during the Day of the Workplace of the UN Commission on Sustainable Development (4th annual Session of the UN CSD, New York, May 1996). (The Casebook is directly available from the INEM Main Secretariat, Bahnhofstrasse 36, D-22880 Wedel, Germany).
In May 1997, the Bank and ECO-Conseil sent a delegation to the Third UNEP International Roundtable on Finance & the Environment (Columbia University, 22-23 May 1997). PREVair was selected in July 1997 by the International
Jury of the Expo 2000 to be the only (so far) international project from France selected for the Universal Exposition 2000 (Hannover, Germany from April to October 2000). In the last years, several banks inside the Banque
Populaire Federation have requested the authorization from the Bank to offer PREVair in their regions. ECO-Conseil and the Bank have developed a "transfer protocol" for that purpose, whereby the recipient bank pays a
"licensing fee" for the right to use the name and concept. We have also decided to make the programme available to banks in transition and developing countries free of charge. Unfortunately, this only means that
there are no licensing fee, not that ECO-Conseil or the BP will at their own costs travel to these countries and advise local banks on setting up a programme. A key element of course is the need for an eco-counsellor or a person
with similar training to provide the needed technical assistance. The programme cannot therefore be transferred turnkey overnight. French banks which have recently agreed to offer PREVair:
Banque Populaire of Saint-Denis (Oise), Another innovative mechanism was the establishment of a PREVair scheme by the "Maison de l'Environnement" of Chalon-sur-Saône, through a "banking pool" of several local banks under the aegis of the Chamber of
Commerce and Industry of the Bourgogne region. Other banks in Dijon, Grenoble and Troyes have expressed their interest. Internationally, ECO-Conseil is in discussion with banks in Spain and Portugal to transfer PREVair there. The
division of labour between the bank and ECO-Conseil is approximately as follows: the bank deals with all financial questions and final contractual issues, ECO-Conseil deals with the technical assistance aspects, and outreach
outside of France. ECO-Conseil representatives have presented the PREVair scheme at UNEP meetings (at the occasion of the international celebrations for World Environment Day in Beijing and Pretoria), at a meeting of the Global
500 Forum of UNEP (Kuala Lumpur), and in such diverse countries as the Philippines and Argentina. 4. Relevance for Central and Eastern Europe The process of economic restructuring in CEEC will lead to
the number of SMEs increasing sharply, as has already happened since 1989. Unfortunately, such SMEs collectively pollute a lot, and create a diffuse pollution which is very expensive to fight. It in particular leads to much higher
than otherwise needed expenditures on wastewater treatment plants. (This is one of the reasons why the Agence de l'Eau Rhin-Meuse - the French governmental agency in charge of water quality in the Rhin-Meuse river basin
- is one of the several central government agencies member of the Comité PREVair.) Since the capital stock of SMEs is being (re)constituted very fast at the present time, it is important that new investment
incorporate as much as possible sound environmental considerations, to avoid future costly end-of-the-pipe adjustments. That is the main rationale for trying out this SME environmental financing scheme in Central and Eastern
Europe. Such a programme could make the difference between an SME investing the absolute minimum it needs now, and a better equipment which it otherwise would not consider. The agricultural aspect of PREVair may be especially
relevant in CEE countries which struggle with a restructuring of their agriculture, with large potential problems if restructuring leads to a large number of farm hands losing their livelihoods (e.g. rural exodus potentially adding
to strain in cities and crating social unrest, as well greater as political instability), but also opportunities if private farms can obtain investments to modernize, and e.g. produce high-quality agricultural goods for exports
with continued low synthetic chemical input (under an "organic" label?). The restructuring of Eastern European agriculture is the major (budgetary) obstacle to a quick integration of many countries in the EU, as the
extension of the present EU Common Agricultural Programme would stretch the capabilities of all present EU members, even the most "pro-widening". This is of course also a problem inside the EU, including one of the
largest environmental ones. Maybe the introduction of PREVair type schemes can be one of the steps required to "soft land" Eastern European agriculture. In this case, the need for an agriculturally-trained
eco-counsellor would be even more important, as bankers usually know even less about agriculture (except specialized banks) than they do about industry and services. In 1993, ECO-Conseil started a project of sustainable regional
development for the region of Baranya in Southern Hungary (with, among others, the Ormansag Foundation as main partner, winner of the 1995 UNEP Global 500 Award). In the course of this project, a local bank became interested in the
PREVair scheme and made a pre-feasibility study for the introduction of the scheme in Baranya. We therefore decided to try to create the right enabling environment for a potential transfer of PREVair to Hungary as a
pilot-project, for potential expansion to other CEE countries. To promote the personal contacts which might create the necessary trust for the transfer, we organized visits of French bankers to Hungary, as well as visits of
Hungarian bankers to Alsace. However, we were not able to continue the project once the initial funding expired, for lack of human resources to acquire more funding. The project to transfer PREVair to Hungary could
be restarted any time. 5. Conclusions and Recommendations 5.1 general conclusions and recommendations Most international financial institutions and national governments are aware of and concerned about the problem of SMEs in
general, about the environmental problems associated with them, and about the need to promote environmental investments by small and medium sized companies. Though we have seen no quantitative analysis, it would seem that
there are proportionately fewer people and programmes devoted to helping SMEs than focused on large companies. The main problem are the high transaction costs, which are only marginally smaller for a small loan than for a larger
one, but which compared to the total loan amount, is higher by several orders of magnitude. The most promising approach for aid agencies, IFIs and national governments, seems therefore to be to
1. collect information on existing successful mechanisms to help SMEs; 2. evaluate their success factors (including contextual) and conditions for successful replication; 3. actively help to expand, adapt, transfer and
otherwise spread the use of the most successful ones.
In addition, national and international should seek to focus on the most salient bottlenecks preventing such mechanisms from being adopted in other circumstances. It is probable that such bottlenecks are already well-know
documented ones, and already on the agenda of international institutions, but whose linkage to the SME problem might give a new impetus to the political will and priority-setting necessary to solving them. Such priority-setting
may be helped if it were more clearly communicated to policy-makers the tremendous positive impact which a healthy middle segment of the economy brings with it. The positive reinforcement and virtuous circle resulting from a strong
and vibrant small to medium size business sector on the social and political stability of a country is difficult to overestimate. A strong SME sector is not only the basis of a diversified and resilient economy, as well a
creator of local employment, but also the basis for a strong middle class. It is the growth of a broad middle class which is the driver of a civil society which can serve as an antidote to political abuses of power. It may be
observed that stable democracies (i.e. those without significant casualties due to internal civil strife such as in India) are the ones which also possess the broadest middle class, as well as the strongest medium sized business
sector. In this case, it may be justified to say that economic empowerment truly leads to political empowerment, and that strong SMEs are one of the keys of a stable democratic order.
5.2 specific conclusions and recommendations While detailed quantitative details about reduced emissions are not available (partly because of the reluctance of SMEs to face the hard facts of their pre-investment
pollution levels), the 8 year multi-million environmental investments track record of PREVair in over 300 small companies has shown that it is possible the overcome the traditional problems associated with SMEs. Further
research to evaluate the exact quantitative environmental benefits would be useful, to prove without a doubt the effectiveness of the PREVair approach. SME problems, mainly high costs associated with project identification and
evaluation, are borne by a variety of actors, but mainly the bank. In turn, the bank is able and willing to take a risk because of the strong trusting relationship which it has established with the European Institute
ECO-Conseil (an environmental capacity-building NGO) over the years, and because it can dispose of a human infrastructure which was created by the capacity-building efforts of ECO-Conseil, i.e., the training of eco-counsellors. The
second major success factor is the widespread ownership by stakeholders represented in the Committee of Experts. These experts, coming from national, regional and local government and administrations, business and farmers
associations, training bodies and an NGO, as well as private companies, feel a personal stake in the success of PREVair, and after the visible success of the scheme, pride in their contribution to make local SMEs more
environmentally sound. Thus this multi-sector government-business-NGO partnership is a crucial factor in the sustainability of the programme. Finally, a key question to ask is whether the overall economic and social
environment, including the existence of social safety nets etc., is a necessary condition for the success of PREVair, or just another positive enabling factor. The recent transfer of PREVair to other regions of France,
including ones with much lower per-capita income, will bring some empirical data to bear on this question (remember that Alsace has the second-highest per-capita income after the Paris region). It would also be interesting to test
PREVair in the less favourable type of economic environment which predominates today in Central and Eastern Europe. Our opinion is that while the general economic environment plays a role, that the determining factors for the
success of PREVair are the technical assistance part by the eco-counsellor, the multi-stakeholder involvement with right of veto, and the climate of trust, both between the lending bank and ECO-Conseil, and between the small
company owners and the eco-counsellor. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| [PREVair - 2] [PREVair - 3] [PREVair - 4] [PREVair - 5] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Designed by AnyaDavis.com |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||